Mt Pinatubo
1991 Eruption
Effects on particular river systems
Tarlac River system
The upper portion of the Tarlac catchment (to the north of Pinatubo)
stored a relatively large amount of potential lahar source material
(Table 11), but experienced limited effects from lahars. This was
partially due to natural retention features in the upper O'Donnell
and Bangat valleys, where large amounts of pyroclastic flow deposits
were emplaced in broad flat valleys, upstream of bedrock valley
constrictions. In addition these catchments are in the rain shadow
of the Southwest Monsoon. However, the potential for destructive
lahars remains, especially during typhoons, due to the large amount
of pyroclastic-flow deposits remaining in the upper catchment.
Bambam River system
The
Sacobia River is the most active tributary of the Bambam, and had
0.6-0.9 km3 of pyroclastic deposits in its upper reaches.
In 1992 a secondary pyroclastic flow caused erosion between the
Abacan and Sacobia Rivers, allowing the Sacobia to capture part
of the Abacan flows.
From 1991-1993 around 0.2 km3 of sediment was deposited
along the Sacobia River. 1991 flows reached 40 km from the volcano
near Concepcion (Fig. 20), inundating 90 km2 of farmland
and low-lying communities adjacent to the river. Intermittent damming
of the Sacobia's tributaries led to several temporary lakes forming.
Breaching of one of these lake impoundments contributed to a lahar
that destroyed a highway bridge across the Bambam. Accumulation
of sediment in the lower reaches of the Sacobia River led to aggradation
further upstream in 1992-1993. Numerous lahar avulsions and lake-breakout
floods occurred burying parts of the towns of Mabalacat and Bambam
in 1992 and 1993.
Another secondary pyroclastic flow occurred in the headwaters of
the Sacobia in 1993, filling the channels and diverting subsequent
flows towards the Pasig-Potrero River. This resulted in no lahars
in 1994 in the Sacobia and much reduced sediment remobilisation.
Abacan River system
Portions of the headwaters of this river drain parts of the upper
Sacobia valley, which produces many lahars. However, other portions
of the headwaters drain only tephra-covered slopes, leading to flooding
and sediment discharge but no lahars. A large dike was constructed
to prevent avulsion into Angeles City in 1991. More than 40 lahars
occurred in the Abacan River during the 1991 monsoon season as well
as at least one during the eruption. These lahars destroyed all
of the bridges across the Abacan upstream of Mexico and caused bank
collapses that destroyed hundreds of buildings in Angeles City.
Overbank sediment deposition downstream of Angeles City covered
around 25 km2 in 1991, especially near Mexico.
Pasig-Potrero River system
The
Pasig-Potrero drains the southeastern portion of a large fan of
pyroclastic flow deposits on the eastern volcano flanks, and has
0.3-0.5 km3 of potential source material. From 1991-1993
around 0.14 km3 of material has been eroded and redeposited
downstream. The 1993 secondary pyroclastic flow in the Sacobia headwaters
increased the Pasig-Potrero watershed and contributed to a further
0.13 km3 of sediment deposited along the Pasig-Potrero
in 1994. Monsoon lahar activity in this river system was high in
1991 and two lahars also occurred during the eruption. Lahars avulsed
flood control levees and inundated around 10 km2 of agricultural
land as well as contributing enormous quantities of fine sediment
that silted up canals and fish ponds.
From 1991-1994 channel aggradation moved upstream to cause frequent
avulsions near Mancatian and Porac, which continued in 1995. Lake
breakouts during this time transported sediments further downstream
toward Bacalor. Typhoon Kadiang in July 1995 caused dilute floods
and incision of a channel. Successive floods continued to deepen
and extend the channel downstream, moving sediment further downstream
to slowly bury the town of Bacalor. Five successive lahars generated
during Typhoon Mameng in October 1995 inundated around 25 km2
and killed up to 100 people in a part of Bacalor.
Plate
11. The Porac River at Porac. Note how the river has aggraded
to the level of the bridge (in the distance). Pumiceous sediment
has been bulldozed from the channel to create stop-banks alongside
homes evacuated after lahars partially destroyed them. - V. E.
Neall.
Plate
12. Aerial view of the Pasig-Potrero where since 1991 lahars
have continued to overflow the channel and bury the town of Bacalor
in sediment. A two storied building is visible to the right. Despite
the efforts of hundreds of pieces of earth-moving machinery it was
not possible to build stop-banks large enough to contain the rapidly
aggrading river bed. - V. E. Neall.
Plate
13. Along the main highway from Manila to Clark Air Base, near
Los Angeles, where decking of the bridge was swept away by lahars
following the Pinatubo eruption in 1991. - V. E. Neall.
Gumain River system
Large rain-induced lahars occurred in the Gumain and Porac rivers
during the 1991 eruption, burying houses in Floridablanca and Porac
to roof level. After further lahars later in the year only an estimated
20-40 % of potential lahar source material remained in the upper
catchment. Aggradation in the mid-lower reaches of the Gumain in
1991 resulted in the river bed being 4-5 m higher than the surrounding
alluvial fan, being currently contained between flood control levees.
Widespread fish pond and canal siltation also occurred during 1991
in the lower reaches of the Gumain.
Santo Thomas River System
Between June-November 1991, 73 lahars were recorded in this catchment
to the SW of Pinatubo. The Santo Thomas drains a 1.3 km3
1991 pyroclastic-flow deposit fan (the Marella Pyroclastic Fan).
Both hot and cold lahars have occurred in this catchment. The hot
flows originated from rainfall remobilisation of pyroclastic-flow
deposits and the cold ones from breakout of dammed tributaries in
the upper catchment. In 1991 a temporary lake (Lake Mapanuepe; Fig.
25) was developed up to 19 times, each time ending with a lake-breakout
flood that transformed to a lahar. These lake-breakout lahars flooded
large downstream areas, destroying homes and claiming at least one
life.
Repeated lahars until the end of 1994 have deposited > 0.5 km3
of sediment over an area of > 46 km2, burying seven
communities and threatening several others. Lake Mapanuepe, was
still in existence at the end of 1995 and its continued rise necessitated
cutting of an artificial outlet, to maintain a lower lake level
and minimise the potential for catastrophic floods. At its highest
level, the lake covered an area of 14 km2, containing
around 200 million m3 of water (20x the volume of Crater
Lake on Ruapehu).
Maloma River system
The Maloma River drains only a small area of pyroclastic flow deposits
and does not have the potential to produce as many lahars as other
river systems surrounding Pinatubo. However, some cold lahars have
occurred, including a large event during the eruption. These completely
filled the Maloma channel with sediment by the end of 1991 so that
the river flowed through rice paddies to the sea.
Bucao River system
The largest volume of pyroclastic deposits (2.5-3.1 km3)
fills the upper catchment of this river, forming a steep valley-fill
deposit covering the north and northwest volcano flanks. A large
mass failure of these deposits caused a 10 km-long secondary pyroclastic
flow in 1991. Major lahars did not occur in this catchment until
the 1991 monsoon season, but sediment had totally inundated the
lower Bucao valley in up to 25 m of sediment by the end of 1991.
Later lahars threatened the town of Botolan.
Socio-economic effects of the Pinatubo eruptions
Not only have lives been lost during the Pinatubo eruption and
following events, but also major damage has been sustained to the
infrastructure and economy of central Luzon. The 1991-1992 damage
alone amounted to over US$460 million. Damage to crops, agricultural
land, personal property and infrastructure still occurs years after
the eruption was over, disrupting what was a flourishing economy.
Major resources have been diverted from key development activities
to relief, recovery and damage prevention measures. The Costs to
support evacuees and for lahar dikes and sediment retention structures
over the 1991-1992 period amounted to around US$ 150 million. In
fact the longevity and magnitude of the eruption's impacts are so
great that return to pre-eruption conditions is impossible. Responses
must be to create an environment for new investment, alternative
employment and promote growth in areas safe from lahars and to develop
infrastructure able to withstand future natural disasters.
The
eruption effects have resulted in displacement of >50 000 people
whose houses were destroyed and/or farmland buried. The Aeta peoples
formerly living on the slopes of Pinatubo were initially hardest
hit, although later, people on the surrounding lowlands also began
to be seriously affected. Evacuations have also resulted in upsetting
social standings and leadership, caused suspicions between neighbouring
communities, and resulted in high levels of psychological stress.
Resettlements have also created similar problems, and humanitarian
relief is becoming a way of life for many people.
Plate 14. Refugee camp for Aeta people who escaped from the
mountains around Mt Pinatubo. Left homeless and with few possessions
they suffered most from the deprivation resulting from one of the
biggest eruptions this Century. - V. E. Neall.
Overall distribution of Pinatubo's eruption products
Figure
28
It
is predicted that eventually only 63% of the 1991 pyroclastic-flow
deposits erupted from Pinatubo will be preserved (Fig. 28). The
remaining fraction will be remobilised and mostly redeposited by
lahars with a small fraction of silt carried out to sea.
|