Geohazards  
   
     
 
 
   
 
 
 

 

 
 

Case Histories

Phoenix Kobe A lesson in Disaster Recovery: comments on community
recovery following the 1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake, Japan.



In this section we discuss the magnitudes and effects of major historical earthquakes. Some of these earthquakes were catastrophic, with widespread destruction resulting in loss of hundreds of thousands of lives. Others, however, although being high magnitude events, were not as destructive, and had much smaller death tolls. By comparing the examples discussed, the contrasting effects for events with similar magnitudes can be explained, e.g. different foundation conditions, different building practices, differences in earthquake associated hazards (tsunamis, landslides, fires).



Table 2.
Major historical earthquakes

 

Location

Magnitude (Ms)

Date

Death toll

Corinth, Greece

 

856

45,000

Cilicia, Asia Minor

 

1268

60,000

Chihli, China

 

1290

100,000

Shansi, China

 

1556

830,000

Caucasia, Shemaka

 

1667

80,000

Calcutta, India

 

1737

300,000

Lisbon, Portugal

8.75

1755

60,000

San Francisco, USA

8.3

1906

700

Messina, Italy

7.5

1908

83,000

Kansu, China

8.6

1920

100,000

Tokyo, Japan

8.3

1923

143,000

Northern Peru

7.8

1970

66,000

San Fernando, California

6.5

1971

65

Tangshan, China

7.6

1976

650,000

Armenia, Soviet Union

7.0

1988

25,000

Loma Prieta, California, USA

7.1

1989

63

Newcastle, Australia

5.6

1989

12


1755 Lisbon earthquake
(geological controls)

Magnitude: Ms 8.75

Loss of life: 60,000

Damage: Destroyed half of city of Lisbon

The 1755 Lisbon earthquake is possibly the largest historical earthquake known and was felt widely over south-western Europe and north-eastern Africa. Lisbon is built on soft sediments and rock; the part of the city founded on the sediments was almost completely destroyed by the violent shaking and vertical displacement characteristic of this earthquake. The earthquake also triggered tsunami which submerged the lower town beneath 15 m of water, were recorded on both sides of the Atlantic and caused seiching in ponds and lakes throughout western Europe.

1906 San Francisco earthquake
(costly insurance losses)

Magnitude: Ms 8.3

Loss of life: 700

Damage: $350 million - $1 billion US

The 1906 San Francisco earthquake occurred on a section of the famous San Andreas fault. The fault of the San Andreas fault totals 500 km in the past 100 million years, with a rate of strain of 5 mm yr-1. The 1906 earthquake caused rupturing along 300 km of this fault, with a maximum horizontal offset of 6.4 m. The effects of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake were exacerbated by the fact that the earthquake toppled gas lanterns in wooden buildings, causing fires throughout the city. The earthquake also triggered landslides which broke gas mains and water mains which, respectively, (1) fed the fire, and (2) prevented ready dousing of the flames. The waterfront area was underlain by mud and artificial fill, and surface rupture was greatest in these areas. The earthquake and fire destroyed 30 schools, 80 churches and 250,000 homes.

1923 Tokyo earthquake
(fire storm)

Magnitude: Ms 8.3

Loss of life: 127,000

Damage: 470,000 homes destroyed, 80,000 people injured

The 1923 Tokyo earthquake was centred in Sagami Bay, south west of two main population centres, Tokyo and Yokohama. This earthquakes compares with the San Francisco event in the fact that many fires were started and these were responsible for most of the deaths by burning or asphyxiation. The earthquake also caused vertical displacement of the seafloor in Sagami Bay. Parts of the bay deepened by 100 - 200 m, with a maximum displacement of about 400 m. This displacement triggered a 10 m tsunami which also caused much destruction along the shore. The earthquake was preceded by days of a tropical cyclone, and it has been suggested that this may have caused the earthquake, with low pressure releasing the burden on the earth's crust. The cyclonic winds also acted to fan the flames of the fires, which raged out of control, destroying nearly ½ million homes.

1964 Alaska earthquake
(widespread landsliding and tsunamis)

Magnitude: Ms 8.4 - 8.75

Duration: 4-7 minutes, 1200 aftershocks

Loss of life: 130

Damage: $300 - 750 million US

The 1964 Alaska earthquake occurred on the Danali fault, parallel to the Alaskan coast and subjected an area of about 250,000 km2 to vertical displacement, with maximum uplift of 12 m. Ground rupture was observed along 800 km of the fault's length. Damage caused by the 1964 Anchorage earthquake was greatest in Anchorage, 130 km west of the epicentre and underlain by Pleistocene-aged clays (the Bootlegger Cove Clay). These glacial clays have low shear strength, high water content and are very sensitive to vibration and shaking. The earthquake caused these clays to liquefy, triggering large scale landslides, which destroyed over 75 homes and caused the docks and warehouses in Valdez to sink into the sea. Most of the damage caused by this earthquake was through ground failure. The earthquake also triggered 7-10 m-high tsunamis, which overwhelmed Alaskan coastal towns over the nine hours following the earthquake. The tsunamis also swept down the western coast of the USA, damaging coastal towns and cities as far south as San Diego.

1970 Northern Peru

Magnitude: Ms 7.8

Focal depth: 25 km

Intensity: VIII

Loss of life: 66,000

The 1970 Peru earthquake is one of the most destructive in Latin American history. The high death toll was in part a consequence of the weak adobe building construction used, and in part due to a catastrophic landslide triggered by the earthquake which buried 20,000 people.

1971 San Fernando earthquake, California
(costly earthquake to a western society infrastructure)

Magnitude: Richter 6.6

Focal depth: 13 km

Duration: 60 seconds

Loss of life: 64

Damage: $1 billion

San Fernando is a suburb of Los Angeles. The San Fernando earthquake did not occur on the San Andreas fault, but was a result of thrusting of a smaller fault 30 km to the southwest. Displacements ranged from 2-3 m, and ground acceleration > 1 g (horizontal) was recorded. The earthquake triggered thousands of landslides and fracturing and slumping of the ground surface. Buildings were badly damaged or collapsed, roads and railways were blocked and bridges and freeway overpasses collapsed. Liquefaction of dam cores destabilised two hydro electric dams which almost failed. Important lessons were learned from this earthquake - many of the damaged buildings were built to earthquake specifications, yet did not withstand the shaking. Building codes subsequently were tightened. The hundreds of dams in the region have been reinforced.

1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, San Francisco, California
(costliest earthquake in US history)

Magnitude: Ms 7.1

Focal depth: 17.6 km

Duration: 15 seconds

Loss of life: 62

Damage: $6 US billion, 3,700 injured, 10,000 homeless

The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake occurred on a segment of the San Andreas fault that was recognised as occupying a seismic gap and thus having a high probability for rupture in the future. The earthquake was felt in Los Angeles (558 SE of San Francisco) and Reno (300 km NE). The earthquake destroyed or damaged older buildings which were built before earthquake building codes were enforced. However, even structures which had been reinforced after the experience of the San Fernando earthquake collapsed. The earthquake also triggered liquefaction of loose, saturated sand and artificial fill, and caused numerous landslides and slumps. Most of the urban development after the 1906 earthquake was on unconsolidated landfill, and in one district many houses completely collapsed.

1989 Newcastle, Australia
(an unexpected earthquake in a seismically quiet continent, where buildings were not earthquake-proof)

Magnitude: Richter 5.6

Focal depth: 11.5 km

Duration: 30 seconds

Loss of life: 12

Damage: $ millions AUS

The continent of Australia lies well away from recognised seismic zones surrounding the Pacific Ocean, and the town of Newcastle is included in a zone of negligible seismic risk on published design standard maps (although having experienced two earthquakes in 1868 and 1925). The 1989 earthquake was unexpected, and devastating. The relatively shallow earthquake caused violent ground shaking which badly damaged the old buildings in the town, some of which collapsed and crushed people and cars. Essential services were also cut. The cause of the earthquake is unclear. Seismic activity in Australia may be a result of compression of the Australian continent by tectonic activity at the margins of the Australian Plate, or the 7 cm yr-1 northward migration of the continent. It may also be caused by volcanism as the continent drifts across a mantle hotspot compressing the continent and causing earthquakes.



Go to Phoenix Kobe A lesson in Disaster Recovery: comments on community recovery following the 1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake, Japan.


 
 

 

 
 
   
     
Peru 1970 Newcastle 1989 San Fernando 1971 Loma Prieta 1989 San Francisco 1906 Alaska 1964 Lisbon 1755 Spitak, Armenia 1989 Tokyo 1923