|
Case
Histories
Phoenix Kobe
A lesson in Disaster Recovery: comments on community
recovery following the 1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake, Japan.
In
this section we discuss the magnitudes and effects of major historical
earthquakes. Some of these earthquakes were catastrophic, with widespread
destruction resulting in loss of hundreds of thousands of lives.
Others, however, although being high magnitude events, were not
as destructive, and had much smaller death tolls. By comparing the
examples discussed, the contrasting effects for events with similar
magnitudes can be explained, e.g. different foundation conditions,
different building practices, differences in earthquake associated
hazards (tsunamis, landslides, fires).
Table 2. Major historical earthquakes
Location
|
Magnitude
(Ms)
|
Date
|
Death
toll
|
Corinth,
Greece
|
|
856
|
45,000
|
Cilicia,
Asia Minor
|
|
1268
|
60,000
|
Chihli,
China
|
|
1290
|
100,000
|
Shansi,
China
|
|
1556
|
830,000
|
Caucasia,
Shemaka
|
|
1667
|
80,000
|
Calcutta,
India
|
|
1737
|
300,000
|
Lisbon,
Portugal
|
8.75
|
1755
|
60,000
|
San Francisco,
USA
|
8.3
|
1906
|
700
|
Messina,
Italy
|
7.5
|
1908
|
83,000
|
Kansu,
China
|
8.6
|
1920
|
100,000
|
Tokyo,
Japan
|
8.3
|
1923
|
143,000
|
Northern
Peru
|
7.8
|
1970
|
66,000
|
San Fernando,
California
|
6.5
|
1971
|
65
|
Tangshan,
China
|
7.6
|
1976
|
650,000
|
Armenia,
Soviet Union
|
7.0
|
1988
|
25,000
|
Loma Prieta,
California, USA
|
7.1
|
1989
|
63
|
Newcastle,
Australia
|
5.6
|
1989
|
12
|
1755
Lisbon earthquake
(geological controls)
Magnitude: Ms
8.75
Loss
of life: 60,000
Damage: Destroyed
half of city of Lisbon
The
1755 Lisbon earthquake is possibly the largest historical earthquake
known and was felt widely over south-western Europe and north-eastern
Africa. Lisbon is built on soft sediments and rock; the part of
the city founded on the sediments was almost completely destroyed
by the violent shaking and vertical displacement characteristic
of this earthquake. The earthquake also triggered tsunami which
submerged the lower town beneath 15 m of water, were recorded on
both sides of the Atlantic and caused seiching in ponds and lakes
throughout western Europe.
1906
San Francisco earthquake
(costly insurance losses)
Magnitude: Ms
8.3
Loss
of life: 700
Damage: $350
million - $1 billion US
The
1906 San Francisco earthquake occurred on a section of the famous
San Andreas fault. The fault of the San Andreas fault totals 500
km in the past 100 million years, with a rate of strain of 5 mm
yr-1. The 1906 earthquake caused rupturing along 300
km of this fault, with a maximum horizontal offset of 6.4 m. The
effects of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake were exacerbated by
the fact that the earthquake toppled gas lanterns in wooden buildings,
causing fires throughout the city. The earthquake also triggered
landslides which broke gas mains and water mains which, respectively,
(1) fed the fire, and (2) prevented ready dousing of the flames.
The waterfront area was underlain by mud and artificial fill, and
surface rupture was greatest in these areas. The earthquake and
fire destroyed 30 schools, 80 churches and 250,000 homes.
1923
Tokyo earthquake
(fire storm)
Magnitude: Ms
8.3
Loss
of life: 127,000
Damage: 470,000
homes destroyed, 80,000 people injured
The
1923 Tokyo earthquake was centred in Sagami Bay, south west of two
main population centres, Tokyo and Yokohama. This earthquakes compares
with the San Francisco event in the fact that many fires were started
and these were responsible for most of the deaths by burning or
asphyxiation. The earthquake also caused vertical displacement of
the seafloor in Sagami Bay. Parts of the bay deepened by 100 - 200
m, with a maximum displacement of about 400 m. This displacement
triggered a 10 m tsunami which also caused much destruction along
the shore. The earthquake was preceded by days of a tropical cyclone,
and it has been suggested that this may have caused the earthquake,
with low pressure releasing the burden on the earth's crust. The
cyclonic winds also acted to fan the flames of the fires, which
raged out of control, destroying nearly ½ million homes.
1964
Alaska earthquake
(widespread landsliding and tsunamis)
Magnitude: Ms
8.4 - 8.75
Duration: 4-7
minutes, 1200 aftershocks
Loss
of life: 130
Damage: $300
- 750 million US
The
1964 Alaska earthquake occurred on the Danali fault, parallel to
the Alaskan coast and subjected an area of about 250,000 km2
to vertical displacement, with maximum uplift of 12 m. Ground rupture
was observed along 800 km of the fault's length. Damage caused by
the 1964 Anchorage earthquake was greatest in Anchorage, 130 km
west of the epicentre and underlain by Pleistocene-aged clays (the
Bootlegger Cove Clay). These glacial clays have low shear strength,
high water content and are very sensitive to vibration and shaking.
The earthquake caused these clays to liquefy, triggering large scale
landslides, which destroyed over 75 homes and caused the docks and
warehouses in Valdez to sink into the sea. Most of the damage caused
by this earthquake was through ground failure. The earthquake also
triggered 7-10 m-high tsunamis, which overwhelmed Alaskan coastal
towns over the nine hours following the earthquake. The tsunamis
also swept down the western coast of the USA, damaging coastal towns
and cities as far south as San Diego.
1970
Northern Peru
Magnitude: Ms
7.8
Focal
depth: 25 km
Intensity: VIII
Loss
of life: 66,000
The
1970 Peru earthquake is one of the most destructive in Latin American
history. The high death toll was in part a consequence of the weak
adobe building construction used, and in part due to a catastrophic
landslide triggered by the earthquake which buried 20,000 people.
1971
San Fernando earthquake, California
(costly earthquake to a western society infrastructure)
Magnitude: Richter
6.6
Focal
depth: 13 km
Duration: 60
seconds
Loss
of life: 64
Damage: $1
billion
San
Fernando is a suburb of Los Angeles. The San Fernando earthquake
did not occur on the San Andreas fault, but was a result of thrusting
of a smaller fault 30 km to the southwest.
Displacements ranged from 2-3 m, and ground acceleration > 1
g (horizontal) was recorded. The earthquake triggered thousands
of landslides and fracturing and slumping of the ground surface.
Buildings were badly damaged or collapsed, roads and railways were
blocked and bridges and freeway overpasses collapsed. Liquefaction
of dam cores destabilised two hydro electric dams which almost failed.
Important lessons were learned from this earthquake - many of the
damaged buildings were built to earthquake specifications, yet did
not withstand the shaking. Building codes subsequently were tightened.
The hundreds of dams in the region have been reinforced.
1989
Loma Prieta earthquake, San Francisco, California
(costliest earthquake in US history)
Magnitude: Ms
7.1
Focal
depth: 17.6 km
Duration: 15
seconds
Loss
of life: 62
Damage: $6
US billion, 3,700 injured, 10,000 homeless
The
1989 Loma Prieta earthquake occurred on a segment of the San Andreas
fault that was recognised as occupying a seismic gap and thus having
a high probability for rupture in the future. The earthquake was
felt in Los Angeles (558 SE of San Francisco) and Reno (300 km NE).
The earthquake destroyed or damaged older buildings which were built
before earthquake building codes were enforced. However, even structures
which had been reinforced after the experience of the San Fernando
earthquake collapsed. The earthquake also triggered liquefaction
of loose, saturated sand and artificial fill, and caused numerous
landslides and slumps. Most of the urban development after the 1906
earthquake was on unconsolidated landfill, and in one district many
houses completely collapsed.
1989
Newcastle, Australia
(an unexpected earthquake in a seismically quiet continent, where
buildings were not earthquake-proof)
Magnitude: Richter
5.6
Focal
depth: 11.5 km
Duration: 30
seconds
Loss
of life: 12
Damage: $
millions AUS
The
continent of Australia lies well away from recognised seismic zones
surrounding the Pacific Ocean, and the town of Newcastle is included
in a zone of negligible seismic risk on published design standard
maps (although having experienced two earthquakes in 1868 and 1925).
The 1989 earthquake was unexpected, and devastating. The relatively
shallow earthquake caused violent ground shaking which badly damaged
the old buildings in the town, some of which collapsed and crushed
people and cars. Essential services were also cut. The cause of
the earthquake is unclear. Seismic activity in Australia may be
a result of compression of the Australian continent by tectonic
activity at the margins of the Australian Plate, or the 7 cm yr-1
northward migration of the continent. It may also be caused by volcanism
as the continent drifts across a mantle hotspot compressing the
continent and causing earthquakes.
Go to
Phoenix Kobe
A lesson in Disaster Recovery: comments on community recovery
following the 1995 Great Hanshin Earthquake, Japan.
|
|